Hits: 2181 img
Answer: One sentence: the general precipitated LSR is engineered for mechanical strength and cheap high-volume molding; the phenyl LED encapsulant is engineered for optics — refractive index, light extraction, and sulfur/heat resistance at the chip.
MY LSR 3525 series uses precipitated-silica-reinforced methyl chemistry: Shore 25–70A, 1:1 mixing, tensile up to 6.0 MPa, tear up to 20 kN/m, cure 130 °C × 5 min — built for kitchenware, industrial misc parts, and consumer goods where cost per shot matters. MY LEDH 3220 is a phenyl-type addition encapsulant: refractive index 1.54, 92% transmittance, Shore 52D, sulfur-resistant, for medium-to-high-power SMD LEDs where every 0.01 of RI and every percent of lumen output is money. Selection rule: structural part → precipitated LSR; anything in the light path → phenyl encapsulant.
Answer: Let's look scenario by scenario (based on measured parameters of commercially available grades):
Conclusion: They are not substitutes in either direction. Putting a general precipitated LSR into an LED package gives you a cloudy, RI-mismatched, sulfur-vulnerable part that kills lumen output and accelerates phosphor/lead-frame degradation. Putting a phenyl LED encapsulant into kitchenware or industrial misc parts is pure waste — you'd pay optical-grade prices for a brittle 52D part with 40% elongation. The correct pairing: MY LSR 3525 series for gaskets, seals, kitchenware, and molded misc goods; MY LEDH 3220 (RI 1.54) for SMD medium/high-power packages, with MY LEDL 3220 (RI 1.41) reserved for COB/integrated LEDs where the lower-RI match is intentional. Two caveats: ① the 1:5 mix ratio of LEDH 3220 leaves no room for hand-mixing — use calibrated two-part dispensers and vacuum degas; ② both families share platinum-poisoning sensitivity, so keep molds, gloves, and conveyance lines free of amine/sulfur/tin contamination. Verify lumen maintenance and cure completeness with pilot batches before any material switch.
Methyl Phenyl vinyl silicone Gum, plz check MY 3120