Hits: 2194 img
Keywords: dimethyl silicone oil production, PDMS cracking depolymerization, siloxane DMC recycling, hydrolysis of dimethyldichlorosilane, cyclic siloxane redistribution
Answer: One sentence: hydrolysis builds the siloxane chain from monomer (D₂O + HCl → silanols → PDMS); cracking tears an existing chain back down to reusable cyclics (PDMS → D₃/D₄) with a catalyst.
Hydrolysis is the forward, from-chlorosilane route that starts every silicone plant; cracking (depolymerization/catalytic redistribution) is the reverse, used for viscosity adjustment, off-spec recovery, and closed-loop recycling of cured or waste silicone. Selection rule: making virgin oil → hydrolysis line; reworking, downgrading, or recovering value from scrap → cracking line.
Answer: Let's look scenario by scenario (based on published process knowledge):
Conclusion: The two routes answer different questions — "make it" versus "un-make it" — so substitution never really comes up; the decision is whether your problem belongs upstream (monomer quality, hydrolysis pH, chloride carryover) or downstream (viscosity trimming, reclaiming scrap into saleable cyclics). Practical guidance: ① if you're chasing cost, cracking off-spec gum into D₄ and re-polymerizing is usually cheaper than rerunning hydrolysis, provided contaminants are stripped first; ② if you're chasing quality (low chloride for emulsions, cosmetics, medical), hydrolysis freshness beats reclaimed cyclics — recycled feedstocks carry filler-derived metals that poison platinum cure; ③ both routes share one failure mode: residual catalyst/acid migrating into the next batch, so neutralize and filter before reuse. Validate recovered-cyclic purity by GC and re-test cure behavior before charging reclaim material into formulated lines.
Modified Platinum Catalyst, plz check MY 8141-8149